1

I have some issues understandig a proof of the following theorem.

Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $f: V \to V$ a linear operator. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. $f$ is injective
  2. $f$ is surjective
  3. $f$ is bijective.

Proof

3 => 1, 2: Trivial

1 => 3:

Let $\dim V = n\in \mathbb{N}$. Consider $\mathscr{B}=\{ b_1,\ldots, b_n\}$ a basis for $V$.

Now consider $T = \{ f(b_1), \ldots, f(b_n)\}$. Since $f$ is injective this set is linear independent.

If $T$ spans the whole space, then $T$ would be a basis and $f$ would be bijective.

But why does $T$ span the whole space? Lecture notes refer to the following theorem:

Let $T\subseteq S\subseteq V$ where $T$ is linear independant, $\text{span}(S) =V$ then there exists a basis $\mathscr{B}$ for $V$ such that $T\subseteq \mathscr{B}\subseteq S$.

I don't see how this theorem can be used here.

dietervdf
  • 4,664

0 Answers0