167

Let $A$ be a symmetric invertible matrix, $A^T=A$, $A^{-1}A = A A^{-1} = I$ Can it be shown that $A^{-1}$ is also symmetric?

I seem to remember a proof similar to this from my linear algebra class, but it has been a long time, and I can't find it in my text book.

11 Answers11

227

You can't use the thing you want to prove in the proof itself, so the above answers are missing some steps. Here is a more detailed and complete proof.

Given A is nonsingular and symmetric, show that $ A^{-1} = (A^{-1})^T $.

Since $A$ is nonsingular, $A^{-1}$ exists. Since $ I = I^T $ and $ AA^{-1} = I $,

$$ AA^{-1} = (AA^{-1})^T. $$

Since $ (AB)^T = B^TA^T $,

$$ AA^{-1} = (A^{-1})^TA^T. $$

Since $ AA^{-1} = A^{-1}A = I $, we rearrange the left side to obtain

$$ A^{-1}A = (A^{-1})^TA^T. $$

Since $A$ is symmetric, $ A = A^T $, and we can substitute this into the right side to obtain

$$ A^{-1}A = (A^{-1})^TA. $$

From here, we see that

$$ A^{-1}A(A^{-1}) = (A^{-1})^TA(A^{-1})$$ $$ A^{-1}I = (A^{-1})^TI $$ $$ A^{-1} = (A^{-1})^T, $$

thus proving the claim.

D.Deriso
  • 2,379
137

In fact, $(A^T)^{-1}=(A^{-1})^T$. Indeed, $A^T(A^{-1})^T=(A^{-1}A)^T=I$.

Seirios
  • 34,453
35

Yes.

$$ AB=BA=I\quad\Rightarrow\quad B^TA^T=A^TB^T=I\quad\Rightarrow\quad B^TA=AB^T=I $$

Julien
  • 45,919
27

Yes. The inverse $A^{-1}$ of invertible symmetric matrix is also symmetric:

\begin{align} A & = A^T \tag{Assumption: $A$ is symmetric}\\ \\ A^{-1} & = (A^T)^{-1} \quad\quad\quad\quad\tag{$A$ invertible $\implies A^T = A$ invertible}\\ \\ A^{-1} & = (A^{-1})^T \tag{identity: $(A^T)^{-1} = (A^{-1})^T$} \\ \\ & {\large \therefore}\quad \text{If $A$ is symmetric and invertible, then $A^{-1}$ is symmetric} \end{align}

amWhy
  • 210,587
  • 1
    I give a quick proof of the identity quoted. $\textit{Proof: } A^T A^{-1}=I$ since $A=A^T$. We take transpose on both sides. Then, $(A^{-1})^T A=I$. Noting that $A=A^T$, one gets $(A^T)^{-1}=(A^{-1})^T$ as desired. – Sam Wong Sep 27 '25 at 20:09
26

All the proofs here use algebraic manipulations. But I think it may be more illuminating to think of a symmetric matrix as representing an operator consisting of a rotation, an anisotropic scaling and a rotation back. This is provided by the Spectral theorem, which says that any symmetric matrix is diagonalizable by an orthogonal matrix. With this insight, it is easy to see that the inverse of the operator is a similar three-step sequence. Finally, we need to establish that any such three-step sequence produces a symmetric matrix: given any orthogonal matrix $V$ and diagonal matrix $D$, $(V D V^T)^T = V D V^T$. Hence the inverse of a symmetric matrix is also symmetric.

Lei
  • 415
25

Another way to see that is to recall the formula $$A^{-1} = \frac{1}{\det(A)} \mathrm{Adj}(A)^T$$ and to note that the adjoint matrix of a symmetric matrix is by construction symmetric.

Zev Chonoles
  • 133,510
Manos
  • 27,289
9

We have two properties to use: $A^{T}=A$ and $A^{-1}$ exists, here we go!

$$ A^{-1}A=I $$since $A^{-1}$exists. $$ I=I^T=(A^{-1}A)^T=A^T(A^{-1})^T=A(A^{-1})^T $$since $A^{T}=A$. $$ A^{-1}I=A^{-1}A(A^{-1})^{T} $$left multiplying by $A^{-1}$.

Thus $$A^{-1}=I(A^{-1})^{T}=(A^{-1})^T.$$

Anne Bauval
  • 51,477
user120050
  • 91
  • 1
  • 2
2

Inverse of $A$ can be expressed as a polynomial $p(A)$ of $A$ (from Cayley-Hamilton theorem).

So it is sufficient to prove that if $A$ is symmetric then power $A^k$ is symmetric, sum of symmetric matrices is symmetric and multiply by scalar is symmetric.

Widawensen
  • 8,557
2

Every symmetric matrix $A$ can be decomposed as $VDV^T$, where $V$ is orthogonal($V^T=V^{-1}$)

$$\begin{split} A^{-1}&=(VDV^T)^{-1} \\ &=(V^{T})^{-1}D^{-1}V^{-1}\\ &=VD_{1}V^{T} (D_{1}=D^{-1}) \end{split}$$ Inverse of a diagonal matrix can be found by taking reciprocals of all the entries of diagonal matrix. We can see that $A^{-1}$ has the same form as $A$ except that $D$ is replaced by $D_{1}$. So,inverse of a symmetrix matrix is symmetric.

  • 7
    That is correct, for real matrices. But that uses a hard theorem (the spectral theorem), whereas the statement holds for matrices over any field and it is very easy to prove. – José Carlos Santos Jun 29 '22 at 09:37
1

Yes it is. Proof:

Since $A$ is invertible we can write

$A A^{-1} = I$.

Taking the transpose on both sides, using the identity $(AB)^T = B^T A^T$, we get

$(A^{-1})^T A^T = I$.

Because $A$ is symmetric, we can replace $A^T$ by $A$,

$(A^{-1})^T A = I$.

Right-multiplying by $A^{-1}$ yields

$(A^{-1})^T = A^{-1}$

which shows that the inverse of $A$ is symmetric.

0

$$ (AA^{-1})^T=I^T=I=(A^{-1})^TA^T=(A^{-1})^TA=I\quad\Rightarrow\quad(A^{-1})^T=IA^{-1}\quad\Rightarrow\quad(A^{-1})^T=A^{-1} $$ By definition $$A=A^T$$ Used linear algebra equations $$(AB)^T=B^TA^T;AA^{-1}=I;I^T=I$$