5

I am trying to prove the following assertion (, which is an exercise from a section on tensor products in the book Algebra: Chapter 0 by P.Aluffi):

Let $F=k(\alpha)\supset k$ be a finite simple extension such that $F\otimes_kF\cong F^{[F:k]}$ as a ring. Then the extension is Galois.

A related question has been asked several times on this site, for example in here. Reading the answers to these questions, I learned that the above assertion may be proved as follows:

  1. There is a canonical isomorphism $F\otimes_k F\cong F[x]/(m(x))$ of $k$-algebras. Now $F^n$ is obviously reduced, so $F[x]/(m(x))$ is also reduced. It follows that $\alpha$ is separable over $k$. (This step requires a little more argument, but I am OK with this step.)
  2. Therefore, to prove that $F/k$ is Galois, it suffices to show that the $\alpha$ splits over $F$.
  3. Let $m(x)\in k[x]$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $k$. But $F[x]/(m(x))\cong F^n$ as a ring by hypothesis. By the Chinese remainder theorem, this implies that $m(x)$ factors into linear factors over $F$.

I do not understand the bold faced part in step 3. Sure, the Chinese remainder theorem implies that if $m(x)$ splits over $F$, then $F[x]/(m(x))\cong F^n$ as rings. However, we want to go in the other direction. How do we do this?

Thanks in advance.


In addition to the above question, I would greatly appreciate the answers to the following additional questions. (But you do not have to answer these unless you want to.)

  • The question which I cited above actually assumed that the isomorphism $F\otimes_k F\cong F^{[F:k]}$ to be an $F$-algebra isomorphism. In my book, this isomorphism is assumed to be merely a ring isomorphism. Maybe the author took it for granted that the isomorphism to be $F$-linear? Or maybe we can do without the $F$-linearity.
  • In general, which quotient of $F[x]$ isomorphic to the direct product of $F$ as a ring (or as an $F$-algebra)?
Ken
  • 3,032
  • 1
    Suppose you have a factorization $m(X) = f_{1}(X) \cdots f_{r}(X)$ irreducibles. We may assume that $f_{1}, \ldots, f_{r}$ are distinct, or else $m(X)$ would not be separable, contradicting $(1)$. By the Chinese remainder theorem, we have $F[X]/\langle m(X) \rangle \cong \prod_{i=1}^{r} F[X]/\langle f_{i}(X) \rangle$. What can you say from here? – Alex Wertheim Mar 24 '20 at 08:28
  • @Alex Wertheim Thank you for your comment, although I wasn't clever enough to make sense of your hint until paul gave me an answer... I appreciate your help! – Ken Mar 24 '20 at 10:46

1 Answers1

3

Let $m(x) = \prod_{i = 1}^l f_i$ be an irreducible factorization in $F[x]$. We want to show that if $F \otimes_k F \cong F^n$, then each $f_i$ is linear. As $\deg m(x) = n$, it suffices to show that $l = n$. By the separability of this extension, which you cited a proof of, the $f_i$ are pairwise coprime. Hence, by the Chinese Remainder Theorem (and the isomorphism $F \otimes_K F \cong F[x] / (m(x))$ you cited), $F \otimes_k F \cong \prod_{i = 1}^l F[x]/(f_i)$. By assumption, this is isomorphic (as a ring) to $F^n$. Furthermore, each $F[x]/(f_i)$ is a field. Hence, $\prod_{i = 1}^l F[x]/(f_i)$ is a product of $l$ fields. Hence, it has precisely $l$ prime ideals $(*)$. Furthermore, as it is isomorphic to the ring $F^n$, which has $n$ prime ideals, $n = l$ and we are done.

$(*)$ To show this, you can first show the following.

Lemma. For $R_1, \dots, R_n$ commutative rings, every ideal of $R_1 \times \dots \times R_n$ looks like $I_1 \times \dots \times I_n$, for $I_j \subseteq R_j$ an ideal. Hint: finiteness is absolutely essential.

Given this, you can refine this to say that the prime ideals of $R_1 \times \dots \times R_n$ look like $R_1 \times \dots \mathfrak{p}_j \times \dots \times R_n$ for $\mathfrak{p}_j \subseteq R_j$ a prime ideal. Hint: an ideal is prime iff the quotient by it is a domain.

For your first additional question, you can see that my proof did not require the isomorphism to be of $F$-algebras, only rings. Furthermore, the proof of separability only used that $\prod_{i = 1}^l F[x]/(f_i)$ is reduced, which is a property of rings. Hence, this also only needed the isomorphism to be of rings.

For your second question, let $F[x] / (f) \cong F^n$ for some arbitrary ideal $f$. We can show, similarly to the separability case, that $F[x] / (f)$ is reduced, so $f$ is squarefree. Following the proof I wrote above, this implies that $f$ must factor as a product of $n$ many irreducible polynomials. If this were an isomorphism of $F$-algebras, then by linear algebra $deg(f)$ would therefore have to be $n$, so $f$ would factor as a product of linear polynomials. I'll think more about the case where this is only an isomorphism of rings.

EDIT: If $F[x] / (f) \cong F^n$ as rings, the above still implies that $f$ splits as a product of $n$ many irreducible factors. However, we will not be able to show that $f$ is a product of linear factors. Indeed, the issue is that there are nontrivial finite extensions $E/F$ with $E \cong F$ as rings. More precisely, let $F = \mathbb Q(t^2)$. Let $f = x^2 - t^2 \in F[x]$. $f$ is irreducible in $F$ and $F[x] / (f) \cong \mathbb Q(t)$. We claim that $\mathbb Q(t) \cong \mathbb Q(t^2)$. Indeed, we can simply take the map sending $t \mapsto t^2$. More rigorously, the map $\mathbb Z[t] \longrightarrow \mathbb Z[t^2]$ via $t \mapsto t^2$ is a well defined isomorphism. Take quotient fields to get the above map and show that it is an isomorphism.

Hence, we have an example of a field $F$ such that $F[x] / (f)$ is a direct product of $F$ as rings, but $f$ is not a product of linear polynomials. To summarize, my answer to your second question is as follows:

Let $F[x] / (f) \cong F^n$ as rings. This occurs if $f$ is a product of $n$ pairwise coprime irreducible polynomials in $F[x]$. If this is, in addition, an isomorphism of $F$-algebras, then each irreducible factor of $f$ is linear.

  • Wow! Thank you very much for your detailed answer! Two minor comments: (1) In the comment following your lemma, it should be "every prime ideal in $R_1\times\cdots\times R_n$ is of the form $R_1\times \cdots \times \mathfrak{p}_j \times \cdots R_n$ for some $j$." (2) In the last paragraph, it should be "This occurs only if $f$ is a product of...". ($\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2+1)\not\cong \mathbb{R}$.) Again, thank you very much for your answer! I cannot appreciate you more. – Ken Mar 24 '20 at 10:38
  • No problem! And good catch on those mistakes of mine, I'll edit my post to fix them. – paul blart math cop Mar 24 '20 at 17:56