In Adams & Fournier's book "Sobolev Spaces" page 255, there are assertions:
$$ W^{s,p} = F^{s}_{p,2} \\ B^s_{p,p} = F^s_{p,p}$$
Note: Here $s>0$, $1\leq p<\infty$, and the fractional order Sobolev spaces are defined as complex interpolation spaces $W^{s,p} = [L^p , W^{m,p} ] _{s/m}$ where $m$ is the smallest integer greater than $s$.
AFAIK, the above definition is equivalent to the following definition (at least for $0<s<1$), employing Gagliardo seminorms: $f \in W^{s,p}$ iff $f \in W^{\left \lfloor{s}\right \rfloor ,p}$ and $[D^\alpha f] := (\int \frac{|D^{\alpha}f(x)-D^{\alpha}f(y)|^p } {|x-y|^{(s-\left \lfloor{s}\right \rfloor)p + n}} dxdy)^{1/p} < \infty$ for all $|\alpha|=\left \lfloor{s}\right \rfloor$.
The Triebel-Lizorkin spaces and the Besov spaces are defined by Paley-Littlewood decompositions.
In Triebel's book "Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators(1978)", page 169, the fractional order Sobolev spaces are defined as $W^{s,p} = B^s_{p,p}$ for $s>0$ non-integer.
Therefore, the two monographs are coherent only when $p=2$. Could someone explain about this situation?
My background: I have little experience and knowledge of function spaces. To get some knowledge, I am starting to have a brief overview of the famous monographs. However, the problem described above makes me very confused.
Any bits of help are welcome. Thank you!!
Thank you!
– J. Doe Jun 07 '20 at 07:55