28

It's well known that it is impossible to solve a generic quintic equation in terms of radicals involving its coefficients. However: what's the "most generic" quintic equation that is still possible to solve using radicals?

If we think of a quintic as $ax^5+bx^4+cx^3+dx^2+ex+f = 0$ then "the most generic" here would mean such an equation that describes the largest solvable subset of quintics. There certainly exist some subsets of quintics that are solvable, a good example is $ax^5+b=0$ , but I want to know what's the most generic look of a solvable quintic is.

Alma Do
  • 747
  • 3
    A fascinating book: http://people.reed.edu/~jerry/Quintic/quintic.pdf – Jean Marie Feb 12 '22 at 13:43
  • 6
    I'm now curious if the set of solvable quintics is connected (viewed as a subset of R^6), simply connected, etc. – Beren Gunsolus Feb 12 '22 at 13:56
  • 1
    Have you seen this question and its answers https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1019449/305862 ? – Jean Marie Feb 15 '22 at 08:42
  • Would something like this post help? Also this paper if a polynomial can be depressed into a trinomial. – Тyma Gaidash Feb 19 '22 at 15:56
  • 1
    @BerenGunsolus This question doesn't make sense: One can only ask whether a quintic is solvable when it has rational coefficients. – David E Speyer Feb 23 '22 at 14:53
  • 4
    Suppose I mean for it to be solvable with radicals, allowing use of the coefficients. In this sense x^5=e is "solvable" – Beren Gunsolus Feb 23 '22 at 23:16
  • The answer is if one of the roots is made from radicals, then so must the other $4$ since factoring the general quintic using a radical root will give a general quartic which always has radical roots. Right? – Тyma Gaidash Feb 24 '22 at 16:55
  • 1
    @JeanMarie There is broad family of solvable quintics connected to Pythagorean triples. Kindly see answer below. – Tito Piezas III Jan 12 '25 at 18:35
  • @DavidESpeyer This family of solvable quintics and their relation to Pythagorean triples might be of interest. Kindly see answer. – Tito Piezas III Jan 12 '25 at 18:36
  • There are at least two trivial answers which result in subsets of the coefficients that are technically at least as "large" as the mentioned "interesting" answers, because they also only pose one single restriction on the coefficients: One trivial answer is $f=0$, and the other trivial answer that comes to my mind is $\mathrm{Disc}(p)=0$ where "Disc" is the discriminant of the polynomial. – Reinhard Meier Oct 09 '25 at 11:36
  • Maybe one could look for the largest polynomial class listed in Ritt's article cited in https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4241977/can-we-list-explicitly-all-types-of-polynomial-equations-of-one-unknown-that-are? – IV_ Oct 09 '25 at 15:38
  • See also the paper "Dummit - SOLVING SOLVABLE QUINTICS" – Watson Dec 14 '25 at 13:31

4 Answers4

13

Given the quintic,

$$y^5+Ay^4+By^3+Cy^2+Dy+E=0\tag1$$

there is an extremely broad solvable class with four free parameters $(A,B,C,D)$ and $E$ is only a quadratic with respect to them. As such, we can create a nice relationship between solvable quintics and Pythagorean triples.


I. Watson's resolvent (1930s)

For purposes of simplicity, by using a simple linear substitution, we can transform $(1)$ into the depressed form (missing the $x^4$ term),

$$x^5 + 10c x^3 + 10d x^2 + 5 e x + f = 0$$

If the coefficients obey,

$$W:=-25c^6 - 40c^3d^2 - 16d^4 + 35c^4e + 28c d^2e - 11c^2e^2 + e^3 - 2c^2d f - 2d e f + c f^2 = 0$$

then the quintic is solvable in radicals. The condition is simply the constant term $W$ of Watson's sextic resolvent where we set to $W=0$. Those interested in the details can refer to this 2016 post.


II. Pythagorean triples

Or for a more aesthetic form, if the coefficients of the quintic obey the Pythagorean triple,

$$(c^3 - 25 c^4 - 16 c d^2 - c e + 10 c^2 e + d^2 - e^2)^2 + (2c^2 d - 2c f + 2d e)^2 = (c^3 + 25 c^4 + 16 c d^2 - c e - 10 c^2 e + d^2 + e^2)^2$$

then the quintic is solvable in radicals. However the price to pay for this second form is the condition $c\neq0$ since, expanded out, the equation factors as $c\times W=0$. In fact, one can see that if $c=0$, then the above reduces to the well-known identity,

$$(d^2-e^2)^2+(2de)^2 =(d^2+e^2)^2$$

We can adopt a modified version of the Pythagorean condition when $c=0$, if $d$ and $e$ are both nonzero. If the Pythagorean condition has a double root at $c=0$, then $W=0$ is simultaneously satisfied. This can be checked by taking the derivative of the Pythagorean condition at $c=0$, which leads to

$$(e+16d^2)(d^2-e^2)^2+(2f)(2de)^2=(e-16d^2)(d^2+e^2)^2$$

So the primary condition is $W=0$ (valid for any $c$), and with the Pythagorean form when $c\neq0$ or its derivative when $c=0$.


III. Example

Given $(c,d,e)=(1,2,-3)$ then $W$ factors as $(f-28)(f+36)=0$, so another nice feature of these quintics is they come in pairs,

$$x^5 + 10c x^3 + 10d x^2 + 5 e x + f =0\\ \\ \,x^5 + 10 x^3 + 20 x^2 - 15x +28 = 0\\ \,x^5 + 10 x^3 + 20 x^2 - 15x - 36 = 0$$

Using the formulas above, their $(c,d,e,f)$ yield the triple,

$$120^2+64^2 = 136^2$$


IV. Magma command

For those who wish to test the quintics, there is an online Magma calculator and the command is,

R < x > := PolynomialRing (RationalField ());
f := -36 - 15 * x + 20 * x^2 + 10 * x^3 + x^5;
G := GaloisGroup (f);
G;
IsSolvable (G);

Just copy and paste, press the submit button, and it will evaluate the command. (Don't forget the asterisks between the coefficient and the variable.)

Oscar Lanzi
  • 51,942
  • @Somos Thanks for the edit, Somos. Looks much nicer now. By the way, given A360187 (or a Generalized Somos-5 sequence), then its even entries $p = 3,113,57123,\dots,$ appear in a recent post of mine involving $p^4-2q^4=r^2$ though $q = 2,84,6214,\dots,$ doesn't have an OEIS entry yet. Would $q$ be also a bisection of some Somos-5 sequence? – Tito Piezas III Jan 13 '25 at 01:27
1

Let $r_1$ through $r_5$ be any five numbers expressible with radicals (possibly including duplicates), and let $a \ne 0$. Define:

$$f(x) = A(x - r_1)(x - r_2)(x - r_3)(x - r_4)(x - r_5)$$

Equivalently:

$$f(x) = Ax^5 + Bx^4 + Cx^3 + Dx^2 + Ex + F$$

where: $$B = -A(r_1 + r_2 + r_3 + r_4 + r_5)$$ $$C = A(r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 + r_1r_4 + r_1r_5 + r_2r_3 + r_2r_4 + r_2r_5 + r_3r_4 + r_3r_5 + r_4r_5)$$ $$D = -A(r_1r_2r_3 + r_1r_2r_4 + r_1r_2r_5 + r_1r_3r_4 + r_1r_3r_5 + r_1r_4r_5 + r_2r_3r_4 + r_2r_3r_5 + r_2r_4r_5 + r_3r_4r_5)$$ $$E = A(r_1r_2r_3r_4 + r_1r_2r_3r_5 + r_1r_2r_4r_5 + r_1r_3r_4r_5 + r_2r_3r_4r_5)$$ $$F = -Ar_1r_2r_3r_4r_5$$

All solvable quintics can be written in this form. Finding $r_i$ given $(A, B, C, D, E, F)$ may be difficult, though.


For something that's a bit less of a “mathematician's answer”, one broad special case of solvable quintics is those that are the product of a quadratic and a cubic, which both have closed-form radical solutions.

$$f(x) = (ax^2 + bx + c)(x^3 + dx^2 + ex + f)$$ $$f(x) = ax^5 + (ad + b)x^4 + (ae + bd + c)x^3 + (af + be + cd)x^2 + (bf + ce)x + cf$$

Dan
  • 19,542
1

I don't know the answer, but I have a good idea where to look.

If $f$ is an irreducible quintic, then its Galois group is a subgroup of $S_5$, and has order a multiple of five. Among these subgroups, the largest solvable one is of order $20$, and the other ones, of orders $10$ and $5$, are each contained in a subgroup of order $20$. So I'd say the closest thing to a generic solvable irreducible quintic is one with Galois group of order $20$.

Now in principle one can find conditions on the coefficients which are necessary and sufficient for $f$ to have that Galois group of order $20$, but I don't know how to do it. So, I can't tell you how to finish off this answer, but I've told you where I think the answer is.

Gerry Myerson
  • 188,081
0

Just a trick concerning the pythagorean triples @TitoPiezasIII

$$(yx(x+z))^2+z^2-(2x+z)^2=x(x+z)(x^2y^2+xy^2z-4)$$

It's also available for LFT .

Barackouda
  • 3,915
  • 3
  • 13
  • 43