11

Let $n$ be an integer with $n\geq 3$, and let $X$ be $S^2$ with $n$ points removed (as a smooth 2-manifold). I am wondering about the following question:

Does there exist a geodesically complete Lorentzian metric on $X$?

We note the answer is already "yes" under any of the following changes to the above requirements:

  • if we drop the "geodesically complete" requirement. Then we can embed $X$ as a cylinder with $n-2$ points removed, in Minkowski space $\mathbb{R}^{1|2}$, such that the vertical axis of the cylinder is along the "time" axis; then the pullback of the standard Minkowski metric, to $X$, gives a Lorentzian metric on $X$, but it is not complete due to the $n-2$ "holes".
  • if we change "Lorentzian" to "Riemannian". It is well-known that any smooth manifold (without boundary) admits a complete Riemannian metric.
  • if $n\in\{1,2\}$ instead of $n\geq3$. In the case $n=2$, $X$ is diffeomorphic to an open cylinder, which embeds as an infinitely long cylinder in $\mathbb{R}^{1|2}$ with cylinder axis along the "time axis", thus getting an induced complete Lorentzian metric by pullback. For the case $n=1$, $X$ is diffeomorphic to just $\mathbb{R}^2$, which already admits a complete Lorentzian metric as the Minkowski space $\mathbb{R}^{1|1}$.

My guess is that the answer to the above question is "no", but I'm not sure how to approach proving this; would anyone have a hint or reference suggestion?


Note: here are the definitions I'm using:

  • By a "geodesic curve" in a pseudo-Riemannian manifold $M$ (or any smooth manifold with affine connection), I mean a smooth curve $\gamma$ in $M$, with $\mathrm{domain}(\gamma)$ an open interval, such that $\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}} \dot{\gamma} = 0$ everywhere along $\gamma$.

  • I call a pseudo-Riemannian manifold $M$ "geodesically complete" if any geodesic curve in $M$ can be extended to a geodesic curve whose domain is all real numbers.

I.A.S. Tambe
  • 3,191
  • Lorentzian metrics can be complete in different senses: spacelike-complete, timelike-complete, and lightlike-complete; did you have one in mind? (Random link to an object discussing the three types: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1305&context=etd ) – Eric Towers Aug 02 '25 at 04:13
  • @EricTowers Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant "complete" in the sense that any geodesic $\gamma$ can be extended to have its domain be all real numbers. I'm requiring geodesics to be parametrized by what's called (in physics) the "affine parameter", such that $\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}} \dot{\gamma}=0$ holds everywhere along the geodesic. This parametrization is unique up to affine reparametrization. I'll edit the question to mention this explicitly. – I.A.S. Tambe Aug 02 '25 at 04:56
  • I'm not 100% clear on your notation, but I think this means you (only) want light-like completion. – Eric Towers Aug 02 '25 at 04:58
  • @EricTowers What I mean is completeness for any geodesic, regardless of whether it's spacelike, null, or timelike. – I.A.S. Tambe Aug 02 '25 at 05:19

0 Answers0