While solving the vorticity transport equation in cylindrical coordinates, $\frac{\partial \omega}{\partial t}=\nu \left(\frac{\partial^2 \omega}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \omega}{\partial r}\right)$ and performing a transformation by a similarity solution, $\omega (r,t)=\frac{f(\eta)}{t}$ (where $\eta = \frac{r}{\sqrt{4\nu t}}$), I reduced the PDE to the ordinary Sturm-Liouville form,
\begin{align*}
f'' + \left(\frac{1}{\eta}+2\eta \right)f' +4f &= 0
\end{align*}
with a solution of the form, $f(\eta)=c_1 f_1(\eta) +c_2 f_2(\eta)$.
As far as I know, Frobenius's method is the only approach that I've been able to obtain the general solution,
\begin{align*}
f(\eta)=c_1 e^{-\eta^2}+c_2 \operatorname{Ei}(\eta^2) e^{-\eta^2}
\end{align*}
$\textbf{Attempt:}$ Assuming a solution (and its derivatives) to the DE, $y'' + \left(\frac{1}{x}+2x \right)y' +4y = 0$ is of the form, \begin{align*} y(x) &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k x^{k+r}\\ y'(x) &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r-1}\\ y''(x) &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k+r-2} \end{align*} By substitution, \begin{align*} 0&= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k+r-2} + \left( \frac{1}{x}+2x\right)\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r-1} + 4\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k x^{k+r}\\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k+r-2} + \left\{\frac{1}{x}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r-1} + 2x\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r-1} \right\} + 4\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k x^{k+r}\\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k+r-2} + \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r-2} + 2\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k (k+r)x^{k+r} + 4\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k x^{k+r}\\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k \left[(k+r)(k+r-1) + (k+r) \right]x^{k+r-2} + \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 2c_k \left(k+r + 2\right)x^{k+r} \\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k \left(k+r\right)^2x^{k+r-2} + \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 2c_k \left(k+r + 2\right)x^{k+r} \\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k \left(k+r\right)^2x^{k+r-2} + \sum_{k-2=0}^{\infty} 2c_{k-2} \left(k-2+r + 2\right)x^{k-2+r} \\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k \left(k+r\right)^2x^{k+r-2} + \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} 2c_{k-2} \left(k+r\right)x^{k+r-2} \\ &= c_0 r^2 x^{r-2}+c_1 \left(1+r\right)^2 x^{r-1}+\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \left[ c_k \left(k+r\right)^2 + 2c_{k-2} \left(k+r\right) \right]x^{k+r-2} \end{align*} With $c_1=0$, we have a double root in which $r^2 =0$ and $r_1=r_2=0$, thus the indicial equation becomes, \begin{align*} c_k k^2 + 2c_{k-2} k=0\\ \therefore c_k = -\frac{2c_{k-2}}{k} \:\:,\:\: k\geq 2 \end{align*} Testing the first few values of $c_k$, we observe the pattern,
$c_1=0$
$c_2 =-c_0$
$c_3=0$
$c_4=-\frac{2}{4}c_2 = \frac{1}{2}c_0$
$c_5=0$
$c_6=-\frac{1}{3}c_4 =-\frac{1}{3}\left(-\frac{1}{2}c_2 \right)=-\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{1}{2}c_0 \right)$
$c_7=0$
$c_8 = -\frac{2}{8}c_6 =-\frac{1}{4}\left( -\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{1}{2}c_0 \right)\right) $
$c_9=0$
Therefore, $\left\{ -c_0 , \frac{1}{2!}c_0,-\frac{1}{3!}c_0, \frac{1}{4!}c_0, -\frac{1}{5!}c_0 ,\dots \right\}$ and the first solution, $y_1 (x)$, becomes, \begin{align*} y_1 (x) &= \left | x\right |^{r_{1}} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k x^{k} \:\:\:,\:\:\: c_{2m-1}=0\:\:,m\in \mathbb{N}\\ &= (1)\left( c_0 -\frac{c_0}{1!}x^2 + \frac{c_0}{2!}x^4 - \frac{c_0}{3!}x^6 +\dots \right)\\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_0\frac{(-x^2)^k}{k!}\\ &=e^{-x^2} \:\:,\:\: c_0=1 \end{align*} The second solution, $y_2(x)$, can be found by substituting $y_2 (x)=u(x)e^{-x^2}$ into the original DE: \begin{align*} 0 &= y'' + \left(\frac{1}{x}+2x \right)y' +4y \\ 0 &= \left\{ u''e^{-x^2} - 4xu'e^{-x^2} -2ue^{-x^2}+4x^2 ue^{-x^2} \right\} + \left(\frac{1}{x}+2x \right)\left\{ u'e^{-x^2} -2xue^{-x^2} \right\} +4ue^{-x^2} \\ &\dots \textit{lots of stuff}\dots\\ u''&= -\left(\frac{1}{x}-2x \right)u' \:\:\:,\:\:\: \textit{solve with,}\:\: w(x)=u'(x)\\ u(x)&= \frac{C_1}{2} \operatorname{Ei}(x^2) \:\:\:,\:\:\: C_2 =C_1 /2\\ \therefore y_2 (x)&= C_2 \operatorname{Ei}(x^2) e^{-x^2} \end{align*} The general solution is then, \begin{align*} y(x) =c_1 y_1 (x) + c_2 y_2 (x)\\ \boxed{y(x)= c_1 e^{-x^2} + c_2 \operatorname{Ei}(x^2) e^{-x^2} } \end{align*}
$\textbf{Question:}$ is there another (faster) approach?