3

We have Maschke’s theorem stated in the following form (I am working over a field $k$ of characteristic $0$):

Theorem. Let $G$ be a finite group (or a compact Lie group), and let $V$ be a (possibly infinite-dimensional) $G$-representation. Then for every $G$-invariant subspace $W \subseteq V$, there exists a $G$-invariant complement $U$, i.e. $V = W \oplus U$.

My aim is to prove further that every such $G$-representation is completely reducible in the sense that there exists a collection $\{V_i\}_{i \in I}$ of irreducible subrepresentations of $V$ such that $V = \bigoplus_{i \in I} V_i$. For finite-dimensional representations, one can use induction on $\dim V$, but this approach does not work for infinite-dimensional representations.

For a finite group $G$, we can construct its group algebra $k[G]$ and then use module theory, since $V$ becomes a $k[G]$-module. In module theory, it is known that a module $M$ is completely reducible (in my sense) if and only if every submodule of $M$ has a complement in $M$.

My question is: can I do something similar if $G$ is a compact Lie group? Do I have to consider $U(\mathfrak{g})$, the universal enveloping algebra of the Lie algebra of $G$?

Noor
  • 1,069
Viktor
  • 83
  • 3
    This is just not true in the compact Lie group case without more hypotheses. You need to consider e.g. unitary representations on Hilbert spaces, and replace infinite direct sums with Hilbert space direct sums. – Qiaochu Yuan Sep 17 '25 at 11:36
  • And does Maschke’s theorem hold as I stated it? – Viktor Sep 17 '25 at 12:22
  • It holds for finite groups. As I just said, it does not hold for compact Lie groups without more hypotheses. What is true is that if $H$ is a Hilbert space equipped with a unitary representation of a compact Lie group and $W$ is a closed invariant subspace of it then it admits a closed invariant complement, namely its orthogonal complement $W^{\perp}$. It is furthermore true that $H$ is completely reducible in the sense of being a Hilbert space direct sum (which is different from an algebraic direct sum) of irreducibles. – Qiaochu Yuan Sep 17 '25 at 14:59
  • Also the second fact cannot be deduced from the first, because the first fact still holds if the group $G$ is noncompact but the second fact doesn't. – Qiaochu Yuan Sep 17 '25 at 15:03

1 Answers1

1

Maschke's theorem in the generality you've stated it is false. For compact Lie groups and infinite-dimensional representations we need to be more careful. Here is a result:

Theorem: Let $G$ be any infinite group and $K$ be any field. Then there exists a representation $V$ of $G$ over $K$ which is not semisimple (in the sense of being a direct sum of irreducibles).

Proof. We'll take $V$ to be the regular representation of $G$ on the group algebra $K[G]$. There is a $G$-equivariant map $\varepsilon : K[G] \to K$ from the regular representation to the trivial representation sending every $g \in G$ to $1 \in K$, and in order for $K[G]$ to be semisimple, this map must split. A splitting of this map is determined by an element $r \in K[G]$ satisfying

  • $\varepsilon(r) = 1$
  • $r$ is invariant under the action of $G$

but this is impossible if $G$ is infinite; the first condition forces $r$ to be nonzero, but since $r$ is necessarily a finite sum $r = \sum_{g \in G} r_g g$ over finitely many elements of $G$, the coefficients $r_g$ cannot all be the same (since all but finitely many of them must be zero). $\Box$

(This result can be slightly strengthened to a precise converse of Maschke's theorem: namely, that the group algebra $K[G]$ is semisimple if and only if $G$ is finite and $\text{char}(K) \nmid |G|$.)

To get a version of complete reducibility for the case of compact Lie groups $G$ requires that we work specifically with unitary representations on Hilbert spaces $H$. In this setting we can show that if $U \subseteq H$ is a closed invariant subspace then its orthogonal complement is also closed and invariant, and we can write $H = U \oplus U^{\perp}$ as a Hilbert space direct sum. This also works if $G$ is only assumed to be a topological group as long as the representation is still unitary. However, complete reducibility does not follow because e.g. it is still false in the noncompact case, such as when $G = \mathbb{R}$ (the regular representation on $L^2(\mathbb{R})$ has no irreducible subspaces).

Complete reducibility does still hold if $G$ is compact (not necessarily a Lie group) but requires a harder argument (that I am not familiar with); this is part of the Peter-Weyl theorem.

Qiaochu Yuan
  • 478,279