2

I have seen a lot of references on the topic but none of them really contained a proof from first principles that the monodromy group of logarithm is $\mathbb{Z}$. Here's the developed theory in my view.


Consider the equation $f(x)=a$, where $f:X\to\mathbb{C}$ is a meromorphic non-constant function defined on a connected open set $X\subseteq\mathbb{C}$, and $a\in\mathbb{C}$ is a parameter. By the Identity Theorem in Complex Analysis, for any $a$ the set of roots is discrete.

Let $a$ draw a closed curve in the complex plane. Then the roots will also draw curves, as these are preimages of a path-connected set under a continuous map. However, these root curves are not necessarily closed, even though their union has to be a closed set, as it is a preimage of a closed set under a continuous map. We call these curves local branches. A critical point is a root of $f'(x) = 0$.

Denote the local branches by $\{x_1(a_0),\ldots,x_d(a_0)\}$ for some regular value $a_0$, i.e. not a critical point. It is possible that this set is infinite (but countable). For each $i=1,\ldots,d$ define $x_i^\gamma(a_0)$ as the set of values obtained by analytic continuation of $x_i(a_0)$ along a loop (closed curve) $\gamma$ around a critical point, starting at $a_0$. We require that the curve of $a$ must be such that any local branch does not contain a critical point.

Because no root collisions occur along $\gamma$ (a double root must be a root of the derivative, but we assumed $f'\neq 0$ on $\gamma$), each $x_i^\gamma$ must overlap with some $x_j(a_0)$. Thus, $\gamma$ induces a well-defined permutation $\sigma_\gamma\in S_d$ such that $$x_i^\gamma(a_0)=x_{\sigma_\gamma(i)}(a_0)\text{.}$$ (Intuitively, by using the continuation $\gamma$, we "move" from one local branch to another.) The image of the map $\rho:\pi_1(\mathbb{C}\setminus\{\text{critical points}\}, a_0)\to S_d$, given by $\rho(\gamma) = \sigma_\gamma$, is the monodromy group of $f$.


Based on this, here is a proof that the monodromy of the exponential function is $\mathbb{Z}$. The image of $\exp$ is $\mathbb{C}^\times = \mathbb{C} \setminus \{0\}$. Suppose $a$ traverses a unit circle $\gamma$ around the origin, starting at $-1$. The local branches are $x_k(a) = \ln a + 2k\pi i$, $k\in \mathbb{Z}$. For $a = e^{i\theta}, \theta \in (-\pi, \pi)$ this becomes $x_k(a) = (2\pi k + \theta)i$. If we analytically continue along $\gamma$, then as $\theta$ runs through $(-\pi, \pi)$, for any $k$ the preimage $x_k(a)$ moves to $x_{k+1}(a)$. This corresponds to the permutation in which $k$ is mapped to $k+1$ for any $k$ and the subgroup generated by it is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$.


If I try to do this for the multivalued Log $z = \ln |z| + (\arg z + 2\pi n)i$ (or any single valued branch cut on it), I get a weird behaviour for $z$ - if $a = e^{i\theta}$ traverses a unit circle again, then $|z| = e^{\cos \theta}, \arg z + 2\pi n = \sin \theta$. I hope that there is a direct way to proceed from here or some other "elementary" manipulation of equations, rather than through some lengthy complicated equivalent theory. Any help appreciated!

DesmondMiles
  • 3,029
  • 5
    Did you ever take an algebraic topology class? This is what you would need for a fully rigorous proof. – Moishe Kohan Oct 03 '25 at 23:46
  • 1
    @MoisheKohan Having in mind that I am aware of what's going on the written theory above, I lightly hope I have the required background... comments like this are not really helpful. If there are some other completely different concepts from Algebraic topology I need, then just please say with two words. – DesmondMiles Oct 04 '25 at 10:27
  • I think that you misconstrue what @MoisheKohan has suggested. Your hope regarding an elementary manipulation of equations is, unfortunately, ill founded. So what ought we to say, if there are not any "completely different concepts from algebraic topology" that would suffice for answering your question? – Lee Mosher Oct 04 '25 at 13:00
  • 2
    The concepts from algebraic topology that you need are: Covering space and the group of covering transformations. You can find these in pretty much any textbook in algebraic topology as well as in many textbooks on Riemann surfaces. Partial motivation for both concepts (going back to the work of Poincare) is to have rigorous answers to questions like yours. – Moishe Kohan Oct 04 '25 at 14:02
  • @MoisheKohan Would you like to post something more as a proper answer (e.g. sketch on how a proof would go with the two topology terms you mentioned), so that the bounty I raised does not go for nothing, and anyway it would be even more helpful for me. No worries if you do not want and thanks for the comments so far. – DesmondMiles Oct 08 '25 at 17:00
  • 1
    OK, later, but I will take for granted some algebraic topology material (covering spaces and relation to fundamental groups). – Moishe Kohan Oct 08 '25 at 18:15
  • @MoisheKohan Sure, up to you. – DesmondMiles Oct 08 '25 at 19:14

1 Answers1

2

I will be assuming here that the reader is familiar with basics of fundamental groups and covering spaces, as discussed, for instance, in Chapter 1 of Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology." (The same material can be found in many other algebraic topology textbooks.)

Consider the exponential map $\exp: \mathbb C\to \mathbb C^*$. One first verifies that this map is the (universal) cover with the group of covering (aka deck) transformations $G$ generated by $g: z\mapsto z+ 2\pi i$, and isomorphic to $\mathbb Z$. This group is isomorphic to the fundamental group $\pi_1(\mathbb C^*, 1)$. (The choice of a base-point $1$ is just for concreteness, you can use any base-point.) Concretely, this isomorphism is given by the path-lifting with respect to $\exp$: Take a loop $\gamma$ in $\mathbb C^*$ based at $1$. Then $\gamma$ has a unique lift $\tilde \gamma$, which is a path in $\mathbb C$ starting at $0$ and terminating at point $g^n(0)$, $n\in \mathbb Z$. The terminal point of $\tilde\gamma$ depends only on the (based) homotopy class of the loop $\gamma$. This is the isomorphism $$ \pi_1(\mathbb C^*, 1)\to G\to \mathbb Z, [\gamma]\mapsto g^n\mapsto n\in \mathbb Z. $$ As you check the definition of path-lifting in algebraic topology, it is exactly the same procedure as constructing the analytic continuation of $\log(z)$ defined in a small neighborhood of $1$ and normalized so that $\log(1)=0$. (There is nothing special here about $\exp$, the same will work for any regular covering map of any Riemann surface and even a complex manifold. See for instance Section 7 in Forster's "Lectures on Riemann Surfaces.") By the definition, the above map $\pi_1(\mathbb C^*, 1)\to Aut(\mathbb C)$ (given by the analytic continuation along based loops) is the monodromy homomorphism of $\log$.

Moishe Kohan
  • 114,140