In high school calculus, I was first taught that the area under a curve $f(x)$ between $x=a$ and $x=b$ is given by:
$$ A = \lim_{\delta x \rightarrow 0} \sum \limits_{a}^{b} f(x) \delta x $$
Then this limit was defined as being the definite integral of $f(x)$ from $a$ to $b$, and I was told to take it on trust that this was equal to $F(b) - F(a)$, where $F(x)$ is the indefinite integral of $f(x)$.
Of course, I now know that this is the FTC, but back then I didn't, so I came up with my own "proof" via some hand-waving. What I would like to know is, to what extent was this a proof of the FTC? What's missing?
Divide the interval $(a,b)$ into $N$ regions of width $\delta x = \frac{b-a}{N}$. Then:
$$ A = \lim_{\delta x \rightarrow 0} \delta x \sum_{i=1}^{N} f(x_i) $$
Let $F(x) = \frac{d}{dx} f(x)$, then $f(x_i) \approx \frac{F(x_{i+1}) - F(x_i)}{\delta x}$, so that:
$$ A = \lim_{\delta x \rightarrow 0} \delta x \left[ \frac{F(x_2)-F(x_1)}{\delta x} + \frac{F(x_3)-F(x_2)}{\delta x} + \dots + \frac{F(x_{N+1})-F(x_N)}{\delta x}\right]\\=F(x_{N+1})-F(x_1) $$