Questions tagged [quasicoherent-sheaves]
238 questions
36
votes
1 answer
Quasi-coherent sheaves, schemes, and the Gabriel-Rosenberg theorem
In the context of commutative rings, a ring is completely determined by its category of modules. That is, two commutative rings $R$ and $S$ are isomorphic if and only if the category of $R$-modules is equivalent to the category of $S$-modules. In…
M Turgeon
- 10,865
34
votes
4 answers
When is the pushforward of a quasi-coherent sheaf quasi-coherent? Hartshorne proof
In the following we have $f:X \rightarrow Y$ morphism of schemes, $\mathcal{F}$ a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$ and I am referring to proposition 5.8 page 115 in Hartshorne. To prove that the pushforward of a quasi-coherent sheaf is quasi-coherent,…
Stefano
- 4,564
26
votes
1 answer
Category of quasicoherent sheaves not abelian
Wikipedia mentions that the category of quasicoherent sheaves need not form an abelian category on general ringed spaces. Is there a `naturally occurring' example of this failing, even for locally ringed spaces?
Jonathan Gleason
- 8,292
21
votes
0 answers
Quasicoherent sheaves as smallest abelian category containing locally free sheaves
On page 362 of Ravi Vakil's notes , the author says "It turns out that the main obstruction to vector bundles to be an abelian category is the failure of cokernels of maps of locally free sheaves - as $\mathcal O_X$-modules - to be locally free; we…
Arrow
- 14,560
20
votes
3 answers
Inverse image of the sheaf associated to a module (Hartshorne, Proposition II.5.2)
In Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry it's written, that for every scheme morphism $f: Spec B \to Spec A$ and $A$-module $M$ $f^*(\tilde M) = \tilde {(M \otimes_A B)}$. And that it immediately follows from the definition. But I don't know how to prove…
user46336
- 1,875
19
votes
2 answers
Why did Serre choose coherent sheaves?
First thing - I don't know any algebraic geometry. I'm trying to understand a little bit about quasi-coherent sheaves but not for the sake of AG, so please rely on as little knowledge as possible. What follows is an excerpt from Dieudonné's History…
Arrow
- 14,560
17
votes
2 answers
Reference request: Bundles in Algebraic Geometry
I heard many times that quasi-coherent sheaves of $\mathcal O_X$ -modules are morally the same thing as the sheaves of sections of a bundle $V\to X$ over $X$ . We think of a ring $A$ as of the ring of functions of the imagined space…
Nico
- 4,630
15
votes
0 answers
Why is the sheaf $\mathcal{O}_X(n)$ called the "twisting sheaf" (where $X=\operatorname{Proj}(S)$ for a graded ring $S$)?
Basically my question is why the sheaf $\mathcal{O}_X(n)$ is called the twisting sheaf, here $X=\operatorname{Proj}(S)$ and $S$ any graded ring.
sti9111
- 1,775
14
votes
1 answer
Classifying Quasi-coherent Sheaves on Projective Schemes
I know some references where I can find this, but they seem tedious. Both Hartshorne and Ueno cover this. I am wondering if there is an elegant way to describe these. If this task is too difficult in general, how about just $\mathbb{P}^n$ ? Thanks!
BBischof
- 5,987
13
votes
2 answers
Stalk of a pushforward sheaf in algebraic geometry
Excuse me if this is a naive question. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of varieties over a field $k$ and $\mathcal{F}$ a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. I know that for general sheaves on spaces not much can be said about the stalk $(f_*\mathcal{F})_y$…
Justin Campbell
- 7,269
12
votes
2 answers
Arbitrary products of quasi-coherent sheaves?
I have a short question: Does the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on a scheme have arbitrary products? I know that it does if the scheme is affine and I know that they will not be isomorphic to the product as $\mathcal{O}_{X}$-modules, but I…
user8249
- 323
12
votes
0 answers
Morphisms with connected fibers
Let $f\colon X\to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. I am interested in the following property (too long for the title): $$ f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}=\mathcal{O}_{Y} \quad \text{(P)}$$ Under very reasonable assumptions ( $f$ projective between noetherian…
Pedro
- 5,262
12
votes
1 answer
is the pushforward of a flat sheaf flat?
Let $f:X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes and let $F$ be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module flat over $Y$. Is $f_*F$ flat over $Y$? What's wrong with this argument? [EDIT: as Parsa points out, the (underived) projection formula does not hold for arbitrary…
Jacob Bell
- 1,000
11
votes
1 answer
The projection formula for quasicoherent sheaves.
I am looking for a certain way of proving the following : Let $f. X \rightarrow S$ be a morphism of schemes. Suppose that f is quasiseparated and quasicompact, or that X is noetherian. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a locally free sheaf on S and $\mathcal{F}$…
Dedalus
- 4,030
10
votes
2 answers
Gaga and quasicoherent sheaf
Let $X$ be a complete algebraic variety over $\mathbb{C}$. Ad Serre GAGA stases, its analytification $X^{an}$ is compact and the analytification functor induces an equivalence of categories between $Mod_c(\mathcal{O}_X)$ and…
Tommaso Scognamiglio
- 1,488